Thursday, February 2, 2012

Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?

Paramount Pictures confirmed their will be no megan fox in transformers 3. are you still going to see it? i probably wont because whats the point now? that was a big deal of the series. plus the girl they replaced her with is in her 30s and uglyWho actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?Megan Fox was not the whole point of the films at all. The whole point of the films is the storyline and the action. I'll still see the film as i enjoyed the 2 before it and i look forward to seeing the sequel. I won't not see it because Megan won't be returning. I do like Megan Fox as she's a good actress but we need to give the film a chance to work without her. Also, Megan recently confirmed that she wanted to leave and it wasn't because she was fired so at that you should be blaming Megan for leaving of her own accord.Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?
Yes I'm still going to watch it! I love the plot the story and the autobots! Come on she's not the big deal of the movie, the autobots are. Plus I don't really care for Megan fox I think it will be good without her, she can't act. She was just in the movie to look pretty. What are you talking about they replaced her with a Victoria's Secret model who's only 23 %26amp; she's goregous! Her name is Rosie Huntington-Whiteley.Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?No Megan, no $$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Edit: I wouldn't say the girl they replaced her with is ugly, but she's not Megan Fox, and this will be her first acting attempt. Can you imagine having to follow in Megan's shoes, so to speak, and it being your FIRST TIME? Replacing her won't make any sense in the story line, Mikela is Sam's dream girl, he's been in love with her since the first grade, remember? And now that he's won her over (and she's the one who brought him back when he was technically killed in the 2nd movie) we're supposed to believe he just dumps her (or vice versa)? The only way they could pull it off is to literally kill Mikela in the story; and that would just SUCK. It would only follow that Sam would be so devastated by Mikela's death he would rather go it alone. It MIGHT make a little more sense if they hook Sam up with Rachael Taylor's character (Maggie, the intel analyst) somehow, but even that would be a bit sketch.



Michael Bay ****** up when he insulted Megan by telling her the only reason she'd been cast was to "fill out a t-shirt". I don't blame Megan for quitting. She may not be the greatest actor in Hollywood, but she's also not the worst and she has a huge fan base and she draws them to the box office. Many people (including me) enjoy her characters and admire her personally for her courage to always speak her mind when asked.
I know what you mean. How could they replace Megan Fox with an ugly slut?! They should have at least kept the character and used a different actor instead of having the character gone all together! And after what happened in the last movie when they both said that they loved each other. What now? "Never mind. Our love has died"?! Trust me, me and my brother both said we aren't see it. I'm sure no one else will either. I mean, in the last movie, Megan Fox pretty much was the face of the movie in every promotional ad for it. Without her, the movie dies. They shouldn't have even made a sequel in the first place. It should have stopped at the first movie.Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?I am going to see it BECAUSE it doesn't have Megan Fox.

She's an ugly skank.

And she can't act AT ALL.

She's worse than Paris Hilton...which is pretty bad.

I can't BELIEVE people compare that over made up wannabe to a sexy woman like Angelina Jolie.

What is WRONG with kids these days??Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?
I really don't care that she's in it or not, but how will the movie make sense without her character? They are so in love, blah blah, and now they what? They break up? It was stupid to take her character out. They could have at least replaced her character with another actress.
When the first film came out, most critics panned Megan's performance, asking things like "Where did you get this no-talent bimbo?"



Michael Bay answered, "Megan's chief talent is filling out a tight tee-shirt."



They can get that kind of talent anywhere, and for a lot less money.Who actually going to see transformers 3 without megan fox being in it?
I dont care for her anyways. It dont hurt my feelings any that she not in it. From that i have seen on postings here, people mostly interested in her for eye candy.
Ugly? You need to stop playing with yourself. You need glasses.
I will, I don't care who is in it

No comments:

Post a Comment